Reading time: about 1 min

Abstract

The article compares the institutional basis and the practical operation of mediation in criminal matters in the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary and Slovakia. It identifies the factors that influence how widely mediation is used and sets out recommendations for Slovak practice.

1. Background

Victim offender mediation is among the most widespread instruments of restorative justice in Europe. The V4 countries introduced it at different times and with differing degrees of institutional support, which makes them a suitable field for comparative research.

2. Comparison of the V4 countries

The Czech Republic has long shown the highest level of use of mediation, where the Probation and Mediation Service operates as a separate organisational branch of the justice system with nationwide reach. Hungary saw a marked increase after 2007, when mediation became a condition of diversion for selected offences.

CountryMediations per year (2024)Per 100,000 inhabitants
Czech Republic4,85045.2
Hungary3,62037.4
Poland3,89010.3
Slovakia4558.4
Table 1: Number of mediations in criminal matters in the V4 countries. Source: national statistics, authors' own processing.

3. Conclusion

The experience of the V4 countries shows that the decisive factor is not the legislation itself but institutional support, systematic training and the confidence of prosecutors and judges in the mediation process.

Bibliography

  • Dünkel, F. et al. (2015). Restorative Justice and Mediation in Penal Matters in Europe.
  • Annual report of the Probation and Mediation Service of the Czech Republic for 2024.

How to cite

Mgr. Anna Kováčová, PhD.; JUDr. Peter Szabó, PhD. (2026). Mediation in criminal matters: a comparative study of Central European countries. Bratislava: Institute of Restorative Justice and Criminology.

Related publications

Connected through shared hashtags.